• AWWA WQTC62467

AWWA WQTC62467

Application of UV in Drinking Water Treatment for Simultaneous Disinfection and Removal of Taste and Odor Compounds

American Water Works Association , 11/01/2005

Publisher: AWWA

File Format: PDF

$12.00$24.00


Increased attention is being focused on solving taste and odor (T&O) problems facing municipal drinking water suppliers. For some municipalities, conventional solutions such as powdered and granular activated carbon (PAC and GAC) have proven to be inadequate due to limited treatment efficacy. In addition, the application of ozone technology can be cost prohibitive and incapable of meeting Cryptosporidium treatment requirements and limits on bromate formation as set forth in the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR) and the Disinfectant/Disinfection Byproducts Rule. Ultraviolet (UV) technologies, however, are currently experiencing rapid growth in municipal drinking water disinfection applications. For many utilities UV is the best option to comply with the treatment requirements of the LT2ESWTR. This is primarily based on UV's ability to inactivate many microorganisms, especially Cryptosporidium, without forming harmful disinfection byproducts. In addition, there is a growing awareness of UV-based advanced oxidation processes for treating micropollutants in water. Recent studies (Jobb et al, 1995; Linden et al, 2002; Romain et al, 2003) have identified UV-oxidation as an efficient means to treat T&O-causing compounds in drinking water. A T&O event typically lasts a few months while the disinfection requirement is year-round. To address this scenario, a new solution is proposed in which a single UV system is operated in dual disinfection/oxidation modes. In disinfection mode, only a fraction of the total UV lamps and/or reactors installed would be operated thereby keeping the operating costs at a minimum while simultaneously meeting disinfection requirements. During a T&O event, the UV system is operated in contaminant control mode. In this mode, additional UV lamps/reactors are energized and hydrogen peroxide is dosed into the water upstream of the UV system. The combination of UV and hydrogen peroxide generates hydroxyl radicals that oxidize T&O-causing compounds as well as various other contaminants potentially present in the water. A large-scale field study was performed in 2003 demonstrating the effectiveness of the UV/H2O2 process for treatment of geosmin and MIB contamination. MIB and geosmin were spiked into the plant's filter discharge line at about 200 ng/L (ppt) prior to treatment by TrojanUVSwift™ ECT reactors utilizing medium-pressure lamps. Hydrogen peroxide was also added to the reactor influent at concentrations varying from zero to 11 ppm. This system treated flows up to 6 MGD. The results of the pilot study clearly demonstrated that the UV-oxidation treatment process is an effective and efficient process for the treatment of MIB and geosmin in drinking water to levels below the odor threshold values and, in fact, below the analytical detection limits. Several sample sets were analyzed for disinfection byproducts including haloacetic acids (HAAs), trihalomethanes (THMs) and bromate and the results indicated that the UV/H2O2 process reduced THM and HAA levels by an average of 25% and 12% respectively with no bromate formation. These samples were also analyzed for assimilable organic carbon (AOC) levels before and after treatment and the results indicate that no statistically significant increases were observed. Includes 3 references, figures.

More AWWA Standards PDF

AWWA SOURCES55625

AWWA SOURCES55625

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA WQTC57019

AWWA WQTC57019

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA ACE56331

AWWA ACE56331

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA SOURCES55578

AWWA SOURCES55578

$12.00 $24.00